Sensitivities

Overview

Before diving further you should have a look at the Base Case.

Sensitivities are carried out by changing some parameters of the Base Case and analysing how the optimal energy system is modified. In order to analyse the impact of a single parameter, simulations are carried out with several values of that parameter to detect when changes take place, e.g. production and conversion capacity, load factor of conversion facilities, import flows… Here is an overview of the different scenarios considered together with a short overview.

High Renewable

Belgian system with a potential of 103.3 GW of solar PV, 20.5 GW of onshore wind and 9.3 GW of offshore wind

The potential of solar PV, onshore and offshore wind is increased in order to test how much variable renewable energy sources could be integrated into the optimal Belgian energy system. The full potential of onshore wind (9.3 GW) and offshore wind (20.5 GW) is deployed, but not the full potential of solar PV, as in the Base Case. Consequently more hydrogen is produced from offshore wind and less gas is used to produce electricity. Most hydrogen remains imported because green electricity is preferably used directly for final electricity demand.

Learn More

Farther Offshore Wind : 40 to 1000 km

Belgian system with offshore wind located 1000 km from the shore

The average distance of offshore wind farms to the coast is artificially increased to detect when it is more interesting to produce hydrogen offshore rather than bringing electricity. As transporting hydrogen is cheaper than transporting electricity, with the distance increasing, the hydrogen production offshore also increases until it becomes more expensive than hydrogen imports from the COASTAL cluster.

Learn More

CO2 Budget : 0 to 20% of 1990 CO2 emissions

Belgian system with a carbon budget of 20% of most of 1990 CO2 emissions

The Base Case assumes a net-zero energy system by 2050. But the Belgian energy system is integrated within the European energy market and the decarbonisation cost may be different across neighbouring countries. Therefore, some countries may have net-positive emissions, while other countries have net-negative emissions, in an optimal EU-wide energy system that still achieves net-zero emissions. If some CO2 emissions are allowed for Belgium in 2050, the optimal energy system in Belgium is cheaper and less CO2 is captured and exported.

Learn More

H2 Import Cost : €75 to 300/MWh

Belgian system with a higher H2 import cost of €300/MWh

Hydrogen can be produced in Belgium by electrolysis (green hydrogen) or using Steam Methane Reforming (SMR), or imported. There is a trade-off between imports and domestic production, depending on the respective prices. If the H2 import cost increases, more H2 is produced in Belgium, but the limited renewable electricity potential and the CO2 export constraint restrict the production green electricity and force the hydrogen system to be balanced with blue hydrogen production from SMRs and green methane imports. This increases the need for carbon capture capacity and CO2 exports.

Learn More

CO2 Export Capacity : 3.5 down to 0 kt/h

Belgian system with a CO2 export capacity of 0 kt/h

The capacity to export CO2 by pipeline strongly impacts the ability to use methane in Belgium’s net-zero energy system in 2050. When the CO2 export capacity decreases, less CO2 emissions is allowed, so that CCGTs are less used and more electricity is imported. In the extreme case shown above, no CO2 can be exported, CCGTs are seldom used and the captured CO2 is even used in methanation facilities to produced CH4 needed for final demand.

Learn More